• A High Court judge overturned Ms Parti Liyana’s conviction on Sept 4
• Since late 2016, she has been staying at a shelter and has not be able to remit money to her family
• Her lawyer intends to seek compensation for her loss of wages during this period
   

SINGAPORE — An Indonesian foreign domestic worker, who was acquitted by a High Court on Friday (Sept 4), said that she forgives her former employer, Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong, for accusing her of stealing from his family. 

“I forgive my employer. I just wish to tell them not to do the same thing to other workers what they have done to me,” Ms Parti Liyani, 46, said to the media through an interpreter on Friday evening at a virtual press conference. 

She added that she wants Mr Liew to “apologise to the public” for levelling such serious accusations against her. 

During the one-hour press conference, Ms Parti and her lawyer, Mr Anil Balchandani, shed light on how difficult the past four years have been as they sought to prove her innocence. 

Ms Parti was sentenced to 26 months' jail in March 2019 after she was found guilty in a district court of stealing S$34,000 worth of items from Mr Liew’s family. 

The sentence was overturned by Justice Chan Seng Onn on Friday who ruled that the district court had failed to consider several points including the credibility of the testimony of Mr Liew’s son, Mr Karl Liew. 

During her district court trial, Ms Parti denied stealing the items and said that they had been discarded, were meant to be recycled or belonged to her.

THE FOUR-YEAR STRUGGLE 

Ms Parti returned to Indonesia in October 2016 after she was fired by Mr Liew. 

She was arrested in December that year when she came back to Singapore after Mr Liew and his son made a police report alleging that she had stolen from them. 

While her case was ongoing, she could not work and she stayed in a shelter run by non-governmental organisation Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (Home). 

She did not want to worry her family back in Indonesia so she did not tell them about her case. 

“I tried my best to avoid my family from knowing about my case. So they did not know and I especially did not want my mother to know because my mother is already so old and I did not want her to fall sick,” she said. 

As she had no income, she stopped remitting back to her family and apologised to them for not being able to do so, only telling them had "problems with her employer". 

Mr Balchandani said that they intend to seek compensation for Ms Parti’s loss of wages during this period. 

This, he said, amounted to “a few tens of thousands of dollars” based on her last monthly wage of S$600 and after factoring in increases.  

“If that is agreed to… and the amount is sufficient, that will be the end of the matter,” Mr Balchandani said. 

“But if they don’t and if we feel we have a good case to prove to the court that the prosecution attempts are frivolous and vexatious, then we will make the application and the prosecution will have the opportunity to counter and the court will then decide what amount to award as compensation.”   

Mr Balchandani was referring to a section in the Criminal Procedure Code that allows an accused who has been acquitted to seek compensation of up to S$10,000 against the prosecution or the accusers. 

He said that Ms Parti had also filed a complaint to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) against her former employer for forcing her to work illegally at Mr Karl Liew’s home and office.

She had threatened to do that after she was fired in 2016, which formed the basis of her acquittal on Friday as the Justice Chan felt that the Liew’s had an “improper motive” in accusing her of theft. 

TODAY has asked MOM about the outcome of the complaint. 

When asked whether she thought of pleading guilty, Ms Parti said: “I never thought of pleading guilty because I am innocent… During these four years that I was accused of theft, I have wanted for justice to prevail.”

Mr Balchandani held up his client’s immense strength and resolve as a very important factor contributing to her acquittal.  

“For a few cases I have done, it is very, very difficult to represent clients from that economic segment. Because they don’t have that will to continue… they prefer to plead guilty, serve time and move on,” he said.