Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Couple who abused two maids to serve two jail terms consecutively

SINGAPORE — A couple who subjected two domestic helpers to repeated violent physical and emotional abuse will have to serve longer jail terms than they had hoped for, as a result of a High Court ruling on Friday (Sept 20).

Tay Wee Kiat (left), 41, and Chia Yun Ling (right), 43, will now each serve their two jail terms for abusing two domestic helpers consecutively, which means more time in jail than if the terms had been served concurrently.

Tay Wee Kiat (left), 41, and Chia Yun Ling (right), 43, will now each serve their two jail terms for abusing two domestic helpers consecutively, which means more time in jail than if the terms had been served concurrently.

Join our WhatsApp or Telegram channels for the latest updates, or follow us on TikTok and Instagram.

Quiz of the week

How well do you know the news? Test your knowledge.

SINGAPORE — A couple who subjected two domestic helpers to repeated violent physical and emotional abuse will have to serve longer jail terms than they had hoped for, as a result of a High Court ruling on Friday (Sept 20).

The court ruled that they will serve their sentences for abusing the second maid after completing the sentence they are currently serving for abusing the first maid, which began in March this year. The couple had faced two separate trials, one for each maid.

As such, the total jail term for former information technology manager Tay Wee Kiat, 41, will be six years and one month, while his wife Chia Yun Ling, 43, will be behind bars for four years and one month.

In addition, the High Court ruled that the couple will have to serve about another six weeks in jail, as they had opted not to pay the maids a total of close to S$18,000 in compensation which they were ordered to pay.

The ruling on how the duo will serve their two sentences had to wait until the two trials the pair faced for the abuse of Myanmar national Moe Moe Than, 32, and Indonesia national Fitriyah, 34, had concluded.

Delivering the judgement on behalf of the three judges who heard the case, Justice See Kee Oon said: “We do not see any valid reason for the sentences to commence on an earlier date as that would virtually enable the accused persons to evade punishment entirely for one set of offences.”

Justice See added that the panel did not see the couple’s overall sentences as “crushing” or “disproportionate”. Rather, they “properly reflect the overall criminality of the offences”, he said.

The couple are currently serving their sentences in relation to Ms Than’s case. If the court had chosen to start running their sentences in relation to Ms Fitriyah's case starting from Friday, Tay would be serving only an additional five months and 24 days, while Chia would have served no additional time.

A RECAP OF THE COUPLE’S ABUSE

Tay and Chia abused Ms Fitriyah for more than a year from February 2011 before their second maid, Ms Than, joined the household on Jan 8, 2012.

They then abused both maids in the 11 months that followed until Ms Than was repatriated against her will and the offences were discovered.

Examples of Tay’s abuse of the maids:

  • Instructed the two maids to slap each other 10 times, and bow before the Buddhist altar 100 times, despite the fact that Ms Than was a Christian and Ms Fitriyah a Muslim

  • Instructed Ms Fitriyah to stand on a stool while holding another stool above her head and forcing a plastic bottle into her mouth. She held this position for about half an hour

  • Caned Ms Fitriyah on the head using a bundle of three canes, then instructed her and Ms Than to get into a push-up position and kicked them on the body

  • Grabbed Ms Fitriyah’s chin and pushed her head against a wooden cupboard, causing her to hit her head against the cupboard’s edge

  • Pulled Ms Than out of the bedroom and threw her against a wall

  • Attempted to bribe Ms Fitriyah into lying to the police

Tay’s sentences:

  • Two years and six months in jail for abusing Ms Than

  • Three years and seven months in jail for abusing Ms Fitriyah

Examples of Chia’s abuse of the maids:

  • Provided Ms Than with only rice and cabbage to eat, then reducing it to only plain rice and water, causing the maid to be so hungry that she ate leftover banana skin from the dustbins

  • Force-fed Ms Than a mixture of rice and sugar through a funnel shoved into her mouth by gripping her mouth and chin, causing her to choke and run to the toilet to vomit. She then scolded and slapped her, and instructed her to vomit into a plastic bag instead, so she can eat her own vomit

  • Instructed Ms Than to remove her blouse and clean the house while wearing only her bra and pants for about half a day

  • Pulled Ms Than’s hair and dragged her into the master bedroom, before pushing her to the floor and used her right foot to step on her chest, causing the maid to have difficulty breathing

  • Punched Ms Fitriyah thrice on the forehead

  • Threatened Ms Than that she would send assassins to kill her family in Myanmar should she disclose their acts of abuse

Chia’s sentences:

  • Three years and 11 months in jail, and a fine of S$4,000 for abusing Ms Than

  • Two months in jail for abusing Ms Fitriyah

Tay and Chia started serving their sentences for abusing Ms Than on March 27 this year.

They were convicted and sentenced over their abuse of Ms Fitriyah in March 2017, however those sentences were put on hold until after the second trial.

When making submissions to the High Court on how their two sentences should proceed, Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Tan Wen Hsien argued that the multitude of charges faced by Tay and Chia reflect the “flagrant and frequent abuse” they exacted on both maids.

To let the sentences overlap would be “akin to giving employers the licence to repeatedly abuse their domestic helpers, as long as the assaults all take place within a short span of time”, she said.

“Such repeated abuse should be regarded as a cumulative aggravating feature that justifies the imposition of more consecutive sentences. The same reasoning applies with greater force here, where two victims are involved,” the DPP added.

DPP Tan also said that the court must be “careful to avoid any impression that a multiple offender may benefit from a ‘bulk discount’ in sentencing merely because his offences have been addressed together”.

Related topics

domestic helper court crime jail

Read more of the latest in

Advertisement

Advertisement

Stay in the know. Anytime. Anywhere.

Subscribe to our newsletter for the top features, insights and must reads delivered straight to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, I agree for my personal data to be used to send me TODAY newsletters, promotional offers and for research and analysis.