In land with history of coups, many Turks prefer flawed democracy
ISTANBUL — Turkey’s liberals have spent years feeling that the country was being piloted in the wrong direction by a very powerful captain. They have watched with trepidation as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan expanded his powers, enriched his allies and increased the role of religion in public life.
ISTANBUL — Turkey’s liberals have spent years feeling that the country was being piloted in the wrong direction by a very powerful captain. They have watched with trepidation as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan expanded his powers, enriched his allies and increased the role of religion in public life.
But none of that made young liberals like Mr Koray Suzer, a 25-year-old fitness trainer, sympathise with the renegade military officers who launched a failed coup against Mr Erdogan on Friday night (July 15). Turkey, Mr Suzer said, has moved past the days when its military should intervene in politics.
“The worst democracy is better than the best coup,” he said on Sunday.
Turkey’s politics are notoriously polarised, and its history of coups remains branded in the memories of its older generations. But the scarcity of popular support for the attempt to topple Mr Erdogan over the weekend suggests a broad commitment among Turks to the processes of democracy, even if they do not always like the results.
For long stretches of Turkey’s modern history, the nation’s powerful military, which sees itself as the guardian of the secular state, launched a coup or other intervention about once per decade, most recently in 1997.
But analysts say the military’s independence has been curtailed in recent years through the sensational trials of top officers. And shifts have occurred in Turkish society as the economy has expanded, incomes have risen and many Turks have grown proud of living in a democracy in a region dominated by monarchs and strongmen.
“We are not giving up on democracy,” declared a computerised sign on a highway in Istanbul that usually provides traffic updates. Most of the army and security services stood by Mr Erdogan during the coup attempt, and all of the parties in parliament, including those that bitterly oppose Mr Erdogan, condemned the uprising during a session on Saturday — a rare show of unity.
For many in Istanbul and Ankara, where most of the fighting between those involved in the coup attempt and the security services took place, Sunday was a day of loud pro-government rallies and funerals for the more than 260 people killed over the weekend, most of them civilians or members of government forces that opposed the coup attempt.
Turkey’s nearly 85,000 mosques broadcast funeral prayers at midday to honour the dead. Outside a mosque in Istanbul’s Besiktas neighbourhood, crowds of mourners filed through a white tent, shedding tears and embracing the relatives of Mr Senal Sagman, a local activist from Mr Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party who was killed in a confrontation with pro-coup soldiers.
“There is no God but God!” they chanted while carrying Mr Sagman’s coffin, draped in a red Turkish flag, and placing it in the back of a truck.
While there were no demonstrations of popular support for the coup attempt during the weekend, Mr Erdogan’s supporters sprang into action to oppose it.
Mr Nuri Donen, a local party official attending the funeral, said he was crossing the Bosporus Bridge on Friday night when he saw soldiers blocking traffic in the other direction. He first assumed that there had been another terrorist attack, like the recent strike on Istanbul’s main airport. When he found out that a coup attempt was underway, Mr Donen said, he rushed to join other party activists who were guarding a police station.
He is old enough to remember the coup in 1980, which he said had been welcomed at first for putting an end to deadly street violence. But, he declared, “the coup period is over”.
“You cannot rule by force,” Mr Donen added. “You have to rule by the will of the people.”
For Mr Erdogan’s supporters, the coup’s failure was a relief that they believed would strengthen his mandate.
“When the F-16s were flying overhead, we thought it was all over,” said Ms Zerrin Kuday, 24, who runs a Turkish bagel cart in a conservative Istanbul neighbourhood. Now, she wants Mr Erdogan to harshly punish those who tried to topple him.
Ms Kuday acknowledged that Mr Erdogan’s opponents had accused him of acting like a dictator, but she said his tenure had been positive for her. The economy has grown, government services have improved and public space has been expanded for religious women, like her, who wear Islamic head coverings.
A coup could have reversed that progress, she said.
“It’s not a matter of party,” she said. “It’s a matter of country, of homeland.”
In some ways, Mr Erdogan and his allies were lucky that the coup failed so quickly.
Opposition to him and his policies remains strong in other parts of Turkish society. And while the leadership and organisation of the uprising remained unclear, Turkey’s justice minister said on Sunday that about 6,000 people had been detained on suspicion of involvement in the coup, suggesting a large plot.
Had the coup’s backers captured Mr Erdogan or his prime minister, Mr Binali Yildirim, and prolonged the uncertainty, other opposition elements might have mobilised.
Mr Erdogan has blamed followers of Mr Fethullah Gulen, a Turkish cleric who leads a vast social movement from exile in Pennsylvania, for the plot. The Turkish government has demanded that the United States extradite Mr Gulen, and Mr Erdogan vowed on Sunday to “clean all state institutions of the virus” of Mr Gulen’s supporters.
The United States has not granted previous extradition requests, but said it would look at any evidence Turkey could provide that implicated Mr Gulen in crimes. Mr Gulen, in an interview on Saturday, denied any involvement and condemned the coup as anti-democratic.
A minority of Turks interviewed on Sunday said they wished the coup had succeeded, arguing that military intervention was the only way to stop Mr Erdogan from gaining more power.
And reflecting Mr Erdogan’s reputation as a wily political operator, some said they suspected that he had engineered the coup attempt to justify even tougher action against his opponents.
At a small pub a short walk from Mr Sagman’s funeral, three grey-haired men sharing a Sunday afternoon beer listed the reasons they hated Mr Erdogan: He is power-hungry, he uses religion to rally his supporters, and he is trying to bring Turkey closer to the Arab world and its conservatism.
But they disagreed on the best way to oppose him.
“I really, personally, want him to be ousted,” said Mr Mustafa Kaya, a retired factory worker. “It would be a step back for democracy, but we can’t improve without coups. That is our society.”
His friend, Mr Halil Aydiner, a retired teacher, disagreed, saying Turkey was better off if the military remained in the barracks.
“Now we have the sword at our neck, but not the sharp edge,” he said. “If there is a coup, we’ll face the sharp edge.” NEW YORK TIMES